The Wall of Wisdom
Social Commentary

The 4 Revolutions Which Brought Down Masculinity

How Men Have Been Gradually Undermined By An Environment Working Against Them

1) THE POLITICAL AND CORPORATE REVOLUTION

Now that most Western economies rely more on the service sector, we have seen a rise in women in office jobs. Since women do not need to lift anything other than their heels and fingers to attend to a task, they now have entirely overtaken male spaces.

Politically speaking, someone had the great idea of giving women the right to vote, shifting the political leaning to a more leftist status quo, with significant damages.

Whether in corporations, society or the political sphere, newspeak has taken the stage where politically correct speech has rendered critical thinking, addressing vital subjects, and verbal virility a thing of the past.

Moreover, the more women infiltrated men's environment, the more men adopted the attitude of women, bickering and gossiping when it did not make them softer.

The implementation of good governmental fiscal discipline was thrown under the bus for ridiculously wasteful societal policies.

Whereas before, Politics and Corporations were run mostly by men, we have now cucked leaderships tainted by a lot of feminine nonsense, such as Corporate Social Responsibility and ESG initiatives, to name a few.

You only need to see the training HR makes new joiners take to ensure they align with the corporation.

Women usually take over one department at a time before turning the whole organisation into a hen party. The same goes for political parties.

It is no wonder many politicians if they are not self-established (and even then), have become modern prostitutes pushing the crony capitalism agenda as a governance model.

2) IDEOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL REVOLUTION: FEMINISM AND THE READING RAINBOW LOBBY

Unlike Breitbart, who thought politics was downstream from culture, my stance is the cultural shift happened due to the opening of the political sphere to women.

It was enabled by useful idiots who happened to be men trying to appeal to women as a voter base.

This has allowed women to have their own bank accounts and enter the workforce—the idea for an ever-gluttonous State seeking a broader tax base through women. The consumer-led growth (read debt-fuelled growth) economy is now being bolstered by women accounting for 80% of purchases.

This doubled the labour supply, negatively impacting men who were employees and former heads of the household.

They had to compete with women who were a cheaper workforce. It then became apparent that wherever women were joining in terms of industries, the wages were averaging down to the detriment of the men already there. This was, for the most part, beneficial to shareholders and bosses.

Notwithstanding the sheer ignorance of the women being the happy slave switching from what their little bird brains thought was a slave master (the husband managing the finances) to the actual serf master (the employer) who, through the help of financial institutions and the rise of consumer credit made them the most dependent segment of the population. Because irony has no end, the slave is one under the requirement he does not know he is one.

Women fit perfectly the need for increased labour competitiveness (before the immigrants' question came into play), which ushered the struggle for life most people are now living.

This also gave rise to what was originally a centre of excellence regarding education into a publicly sponsored theft and brainwashing organisation called the education system.

This led to a self-reinforcement of the rising ideologies which now govern society, Feminism and the Reading Rainbow Crowd.

Obviously, the legislation enabling divorce and abortion only completed the full picture, giving women the whole agency, which they still do not want to take accountability for.

Unsurprisingly, men leave these spaces, whether in universities or corporations. The environment eventually turns them into bitches as women start to overpopulate the space. It is only a natural ripple effect that men have eventually become feminine.

3) THE FINANCIALISATION REVOLUTION

The 1970s were the key decade in the past 60 years when the pendulum shifted.

No-fault divorce became first legalised in 1969, and abortion in 1973. Still, most importantly, it was the end of the Bretton Woods system, where the dollar was anchored to gold but not anymore to fund the Vietnam War, causing higher inflation and balance of payment deficits.

The pernicious effect of it is that the Federal Reserve was no longer constrained by it so that they could monetise government debt issuance. It was a great bonanza that eventually gave rise to the Finance industry and its future engineering.

How is this a bad thing, you may ask? Whereas before, rising wages were a byproduct of increased productivity, the correlation ceased, and we saw a flattening of real median wages while productivity was still growing.

A massive increase in the labour supply pushed wages down. Boomers benefitted from a much sounder and more beneficial system than successive generations.

Now, if you want to make good money for Corporate America, you need to be in an industry that benefits as a hub from the funnelling of the financial system's money.

The tech industry was the latest industry to benefit from it. Since interest rates started rising, their make-belief valuations, which relied on hot air, have been crushed. In the meantime, many people have made a killing from it.

Based on the above, the money isn't evenly distributed anymore from the meritocratic productivity system, which is now undermined by a fiat currency system. So much so it has become a casino, where key asset classes such as real estate, when it is not a game of monopoly, are turning into massive grounds for future serf-master private equity companies with bulk purchasing programs worsening the affordability crisis. When it is not politics allowing complete free capital flows of foreign (cough laundered cough) money.

All of these factors explain why one single income in the 50s and 60s could afford a property at 2:1 to 3:1 Price : Annual Income, and now, in major cities, you would be lucky to find a similar property under these same affordable metrics with two incomes.

This has also impacted the identity of the vast majority of men as they cannot rely on their job and financial standings to assert their masculinity when they are not brow beaten by the Zeitgeist and have to eat shit from a feminised society being the slave and executioner to the benefit of the Power That Be.

4) THE TECHNOLOGICAL REVOLUTION

The internet was only the start. The real revolution began when Apple released the iPhone with a Camera, which opened Pandora's Box. Social Media was then bolstered beyond our wildest dreams.

Everything became digital, even dating. Whereas in the 2000s, people registering on Plenty of Fish were seen as weirdos and desperate, Tinder became socially accepted.

It created the icing on the cake in the security cocoon women have lived through ever since these products and services were introduced to modern society.

From the adult day-care centre, also known as the University, to the HenHouse, which corporations have become, one of the last remnants where men could assert their masculinity was through the pursuit of women.

Despite all of the advancement of Feminism, the hypocrisy behind the ideology did not stop at the dating crossroads. Men are still expected to pursue women. It was up to the men to make the first move.

With Instagram, you have men who advertise themselves as Yogurts in a supermarket aisle with their blue tick (aka Product of the Year label) and marketing ads, also known as reels, stories, and posts.

When it is not Online Dating where women choose who they are going to date when it is not a first filter to later filter down through IG who will be the lucky one for whom she will drop them draws.

Social Media and OLD are environments for women, and to the benefit of women, men partaking in this effort are accepting the fact they are the ones being chosen, putting them de facto in the feminine frame. Women bitching about the fact men are acting like women are the pyromaniac firefighter, blaming the consequences of the cause they cherish. The technology revolution also enabled and empowered their hypergamous tendencies to reveal themselves for everyone to see and benefit a lucky few (money, looks, status, lifestyle...).

It has also flattened the landscape so that women could cross State lines to get much better prospects than their geography would have initially restricted them to.

Some may say nothing stops men from approaching women in real life. It is true, but it does not acknowledge that practices introduced by these new ubiquitous variables, which are social media and online dating, have impacted the natural encounters between the sexes, not to mention the lockdowns which anchored digital routines among the many. This is not to mention the numerous amount of times men get asked about their social credit score: "Do you have an IG?" when it is not weaponised tactics such as MeToo and social media shaming.

Let's not forget that many women, especially Gen Z, are socially anxious, if not awkward when dealing with strangers (i.e., men not vetted by OLD, Social Media, and Social Circles).

As if men as a whole were not undermined enough by the constant negative narrative put on them by the feminist mainstream media powered by corporations, ideological, and political influences when it is not to mention the financial stripping the "lucky few" have operated on your average man. They now have to navigate a world where if they want to meet a woman, they have to avoid life's feminine shit-tests described above to a level never seen before.

For what?

I will let you decide.

Share this post